
|
RETURN TO CONTENTS | NEXT | NEWS
BY
WILLIAM KEEGAN |
||||
| Should
the € take a pounding? |
||||
|
The euro notes and coins arrive on the Continent within months, so should the UK be thinking about joining soon? Now that the general election is over, the Government's attitude towards the European single currency has become clear - as clear as mud. The ambiguity of our relations with Europe is illustrated by the very fact that we and the Government talk about Europe as if it were another place, as opposed to the rest of a continent of which we form an important part. National notes and coins will disappear from circulation on 1 January 2002; then the 12 member countries of the Eurozone will indeed have a single currency. The absence of exchange rate transactions within the Eurozone will make life simpler in many ways. But a monetary union does mean that higher inflation or production costs in one country can no longer be offset by periodic devaluations of the national currency. There are many reasons why the British Government's policy towards the euro is in such a confused state. Perhaps the most important matter, from the economic point of view, is the exchange rate. If there is one persistent feature of the performance of the British economy since the 1950s, vis à vis Germany (the major Continental economy), it is that our productivity has been relatively poorer and our inflation relatively higher. The only way we have managed to keep in step with Germany over the years is by adjustments of the pound against the D-mark. One can't help noticing that for some time now the pound has been in the range of DM 3.00 to nearly DM 3.40. But in the five years since 1995 the volume of our exports rose by just over 30 per cent, whereas imports shot up by some 45 per cent. We have experienced a huge and unsustainable trade deficit, and once again history suggests it will end in tears, with the exchange rate having to fall. There is another, quite separate consideration: even if the pound were at the right level for current trade, can we be sure that problems would not arise in future? Which brings us to other reasons as to why the Government's European policy is in such a state. One is that Tony Blair is nervous of the anti-euro feeling shown by the opinion polls, and especially of the Conservative press. Then there is the position of his Chancellor Gordon Brown. He sees it as his mission to improve the productivity of the British economy and conquer inflation in a way which might make it possible for us to survive in the single currency area. But he is in no hurry to enter the single currency.
|
Brown has not attempted to put the pound back into the Exchange Rate Mechanism in the way laid down for candidate countries. He has also made a point of criticising the economic policies of Eurozone finance ministers, and the terms of reference of the European Central Bank (ECB). Some observers have deduced from such criticisms that Brown has sixth and seventh tests up his sleeve as excuses for not joining the single currency as well as his famous five tests:
Which brings us to the unofficial tests six and seven: Gordon Brown believes the Eurozone fiscal rules are not as good as his own, and would impede his plans for vast increases in public sector investment. He also believes, with reason, that the constitution of the ECB is too deflationary. The Bank of England is obliged to stimulate the economy if inflation falls below 2.3 per cent. The ECB is concerned solely with 'price stability'. The Treasury has recently indicated that its assessment of the five tests is unlikely to take place before the spring of 2003. William Keegan is Economics Editor of The Observer and the author of 2066 and all that, a recent history of our relations with Continental Europe, Iynoc Publishers, £6.99. For the full article, see pages 12-14 of the August/September 2001 issue of First Voice
|
|||
|
Whilst every care has been taken in the compilation of this magazine, errors and omissions are not the responsibility of the publishers or of the editorial staff. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the publishers or editorial staff. All rights reserved. Unless specifically stated, goods or services mentioned are not formally endorsed by the FSB which does not guarantee or endorse or accept any liability for any goods and/or services featured in this publication. Copyright NFSE (Sales) Ltd 2001 |